{"id":2401,"date":"2023-04-13T15:53:49","date_gmt":"2023-04-13T07:53:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/case\/2401.html"},"modified":"2023-04-13T15:53:49","modified_gmt":"2023-04-13T07:53:49","slug":"four-appearances-in-high-peoples-court-all-securing-favorable-rulings-obtaining-huge-surety-bond-insurance-claim-in-an-insurance-claim-dispute","status":"publish","type":"case","link":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/en\/case\/2401.html","title":{"rendered":"Four Appearances in High People&#8217;s Court, All Securing Favorable Rulings: Obtaining Huge Surety Bond Insurance Claim in an Insurance Claim Dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The fund manager, on behalf of the fund, filed a dispute over a huge insurance claim and finally obtained a full victory judgment after seven years. This case involves complex legal relationships, including accounts receivable transfer and repurchase, contractual performance bond insurance liability issues, and criminal disputes, with relatively cutting-edge legal points. Procedurally, it involves the innovative use of unreal joint and several liabilities to handle multiple bases of claim rights, addressing relevant entities in a single case, which reduces the litigation burden on parties and poses extremely high challenges to lawyers&#8217; professionalism. Meanwhile, the case went through a tortuous process: after the jurisdiction objection in the first instance, the High People&#8217;s Court revoked the designated trial; after the dismissal of the lawsuit in the first instance, it was revoked again by the High People&#8217;s Court; after losing the first instance, the High People&#8217;s Court remanded the case for retrial in the second instance; finally, it achieved a comprehensive victory in both the first and second instances, striving for the maximum rights and interests for the private equity fund client. This case is a model reflecting HongQiao ZhengHan&#8217;s top-tier dispute resolution capabilities and excellent client service capabilities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"case-category":[299,304],"case_tag":[408,420,421],"class_list":["post-2401","case","type-case","status-publish","hentry","case-category-provincial-municipal-court","case-category-304","case_tag-civil-criminal-intersection","case_tag-performance-bond-insurance","case_tag-private-equity-fund"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/2401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"case-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-category?post=2401"},{"taxonomy":"case_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.zhenghan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case_tag?post=2401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}