An Eight-Year Legal Battle: Breaking the “Possession Equals Ownership” Rule to Protect 120 Million RMB in Private Equity Fund Assets
Independence of Fund PropertyCivil-Criminal IntersectionPrivate Equity DisputesInsurance ClaimsAction of Objection to EnforcementCases exceeding 100 millionSupreme People's Court Retrial ReviewBreakthrough Judgment
Zhenghan Law Firm represented a private equity asset management company acting as the fund manager for two tranches of accounts receivable investment private equity funds. In a complex context involving overlapping criminal and civil pro...
Zhenghan Law Firm Secures Reversal in Foreign-Related Contract Dispute Appeal, Selected as a 2025 Typical Case by the Shanghai International Commercial Court
Second-Instance Judgment ReversalForeign-related CommercialTypical Case
Zhenghan Law Firm worked closely with Quinn Emanuel, a world-leading dispute resolution firm, to represent a Shanghai-based Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise (WFOE). After a first-instance defeat left the client facing potential claims wor...
Turning Defeat into Victory: Second Instance Revokes Original Judgment and Remands for Retrial, Helping a Joint-Stock Bank Reverse and Settle a Dispute Over 100 Million Yuan in Financing “Support Fees”
Turning Defeat into VictoryUnjust EnrichmentBank SuedFinancial LoansCharacterization of Support Fees and Interest SubsidiesModification of Contract through Actual PerformanceSecond Instance Reversal and Remand for Retrial
Keywords: Financial Loans, Unjust Enrichment, Characterization of Support Fees and Interest Subsidies, Modification of Contract through Actual Performance, Second Instance Reversal and Remand for Retrial, Bank Sued, Turning Defeat into V...
Supreme Court Remands for Retrial: 20-Year Land Acquisition Battle Recovers Over 100 Million Yuan for Taiwan-Funded Enterprise
Protection of Reliance InterestsCase Involving Over 100 Million YuanForeign-Related CaseLand DisputesLand Acquisition CompensationSupreme Court Remand for RetrialDisputes over Contract ValidityClauses Promoting Contract Effectiveness
Zhenghan Law Firm represented a Shanghai-registered foreign-invested sports club and its offshore parent company registered in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) in a litigation against a town-level People’s Government. The dispute, ...
High Court Reversal: Dissenting Creditor’s Bankruptcy Claim Confirmation Lawsuit Remanded for Retrial
Bankruptcy ReorganizationBankruptcy Claim ConfirmationPriority Right of Compensation for Construction Project Payments
Zhenghan Law Firm represented a state-owned enterprise (SOE) in applying for a retrial regarding a bankruptcy claim confirmation lawsuit within a bankruptcy reorganization project involving assets valued at over one billion yuan. After a...
Breaking Through Multi-jurisdictional Disputes! How Zhenghan Law Firm Reversed a Litigation Dilemma in Hong Kong
Cross-border Commercial DisputesMulti-jurisdictional LitigationCross-border Rights Protection for EnterprisesJurisdictional DisputesForum Non ConveniensCross-jurisdictional Legal ServicesOverseas Litigation for Chinese EnterprisesHong Kong Cross-border Litigation
As the national “Going Global” strategy continues to advance, cross-border commercial disputes have increasingly become a practical challenge for Chinese enterprises. In this context, the deep involvement of mainland law firm...
Zhenghan Law Firm’s Top 10 Outstanding Cases of 2025
Top 10 Cases
In 2025, Zhenghan Law Firm remained steadfast in its original mission. Leveraging deep professional foundations, innovative strategic thinking, and a resilient professional spirit, we continued to achieve breakthroughs in the field of co...
Zhenghan Law Firm, After Seven-Year Rights Defense, Obtains Supreme Court Support, Setting a Precedent for Enforcement Objection Litigation in Cases of “No Written Distribution Plan”
Priority Creditor ProtectionCase Remanded for RetrialProcedural JusticeObjection Lawsuit Regarding Enforcement Distribution PlanTurning Defeat into VictoryRetrial by the Supreme People's Court
Zhenghan Law Firm represented Bank A in a seven-year rights protection campaign against the enforcement court’s unauthorized distribution of case funds without preparing a written distribution plan during the enforcement distributi...
